Chargeback Recovery Part 1: To Do or Not To Do, That’s the
Question
From the last few posts on effective order screening
operation, you've probably noticed the following common themes:
o Optimizing
your operation often means winning a lot of little battles between doing the
right things and doing things right (with the appropriate nod to Mr. Drucker)
o Collecting
and analyzingdata about what you do helps you refine your screening and
decisioning process, as well as identifying new tests or rules to implement
o You
should strike a balance between the appropriate level of detection and the
potential for false positives that often translate into suboptimal customer
experience
Let’s now talk about chargeback recovery. In a lot of ways,
the themes you noted above apply to this complex but important part of your
risk management operation. Some merchants may not actively pursue the
chargeback dispute resolution process, either from a lack of available
resources, or inexperience with the steps involved. Our 11th Annual Fraud
Report shows an average re-presentment rate of 53%
and a success rate of 42%, for an average
overall recovery percentage of 24% [note: if
you simply multiply the two averages you get 22% but we calculate the recovery
% for each merchant re-presenting and then average this estimate to get to 24%].
Depending on your chargeback rates, business model, margins, and
available resources, you may be considering adding or improving your chargeback
recovery efforts. In my next entry, I'll discuss some things we've learned as
we've worked with merchants in managing their chargeback dispute resolution
processing.
Nice Information .Thanks for posting .
chargeback
Posted by: John | Monday, January 30, 2012 at 07:14 AM